Profound Autism: The Overlooked Challenge in Education
Most conversations around autism focus on Level 1 autism, largely due to active self-advocacy and parental involvement that bring awareness to this group’s experiences and needs. Level 1 students are also a main emphasis for schools, as they often benefit from general education and placements in the Least Restrictive Environment (LRE). But the reality for those with profound autism is very different-these students spend little, if any, time in truly inclusive settings, aside from semi-“included” lunches and recesses.
Beyond Legal Minimums: Real Education and Meaningful Progress
Current regulations like FAPE (Free Appropriate Public Education) set a legal minimum for education, but that minimum is hard to measure and enforce, and the threshold is alarmingly low. Every student is different- varying challenges, strengths, rates of learning, behaviors, and potential. Far too often, education for students with profound autism amounts to mere exposure, going through the motions, or forced inclusion that serves no purpose for the individual child. Genuine progress and social validity aren’t found on paper, but in real life through teaching meaningful independence and skills that enhance autonomy and dignity. *Autonomy is also widely misunderstood but that will be for another article-
A compliance-based, checklist approach does not deliver real learning-it leaves students disengaged and isolated. Instead, meaningful progress arises from intentionally designed activities, strong engagement, and clear communication tailored to each student’s needs.
The Problem with Expertise and Good Intentions
While the overwhelming majority of educators and ABA professionals mean well, expertise is often lacking. Many rely on surface solutions such as building sensory rooms or providing fidget tools, assuming these alone will solve behavioral challenges. When these resources are misused, such as using sensory rooms to “deescalate” students, they can inadvertently cause harm. The sensory room might in fact help in de-escalation *another misunderstanding for another blog- AND it may reinforce the escalation as well---this is not good for the individual.
What matters is not the provision of tools, but the thoughtful, evidence-based application of interventions. Engagement, autonomy, and skill-building must replace rote exposure and arbitrary compliance. The problem is we think we know what to do and how to do it until we really know...right now too many think they know.
Inclusion: When It’s Meaningful
Forced or "check the box" inclusion is not the answer for profound autism. Real inclusion must be both purposeful and beneficial, not just a thing we do. Demonstrating progress means showing in real time what social validity and meaningful outcomes look like for the student-not just reporting minimum standards have been met. There are certainly meaningful opportunities for everyone to be included so we should not have to incorporate it artificially to meet a requirement.
Why Generalization Matters
A hyper-structured or routine-based classroom may be necessary as a starting point, but is rarely replicated anywhere else in a child’s life. If learning does not move beyond structured prompts, true independence is never achieved. Quality programs must help students fade away unrealistic routines and prompts and gradually move toward independence, flexibility, skill transfer to new situations, and routines that can be replicated outside of school. Generalization to the degree possible-using skills in varied, unpredictable environments is critical for lifelong success. The structure and routines that are necessary ought to be worked toward generalizing as well- structure and routines that can be carried over to the home will help so much.
The Urgent Need for Quality Programs for Profound Autism
Individuals with profound autism need much more than a minimum education-they need quality programs in schools, specialized agencies, and robust support for families. School programs must be designed not only for local/state/federal compliance, but for true learning and meaningful generalization, where skills gained in the classroom can be applied in real life. Not all of the needs may be able to be satisfied but we can without a doubt do so much more.
Foundational and Functional Skills First
A meaningful educational approach must prioritize learning how to learn skills and foundational life prerequisites for independence.
Toileting
Real-world transitions
Safety, elopement prevention
Communication (verbal, augmentative, social)
Flexibility and coping with change
These skills should come before academic content like ABC’s and 123’s for many students with profound autism. Far too often, schools glaze over these needs or address behavior superficially, relying on sensory rooms or breaks that may inadvertently reinforce problem behaviors if they become preferred escapes or rewards.
A Call to Professional Growth
It is deeply discouraging to see talented professionals resist or do not have access to learning or meaningful collaboration. True progress requires expertise, openness, and continual improvement-not just good intentions. Supporting those with profound autism demands much more than regulated compliance-it requires dedication to helping each individual reach levels of independence and engagement that are genuinely meaningful.
Stop Leaving Those with Profound Autism Behind
Many programs do not provide the needed intensity, flexibility, or individualized instruction. Quality programs are rare but possible-with sufficient professional training, family engagement, and a focus on functional growth. Every child with profound autism deserves more than “going through the motions.” Learning must be real, measured by socially valid outcomes that actually matter in their life and among those who will provide some level of lifelong care.
For information on how to do this contact:
(949) 287-3683
practicalsolutions.jw@gmail.com
_____________________________________________
info@psbiacademy.org
Comments
Post a Comment